Pierce v. Pierce is an unpublished Court of Appeals opinion from June 2021.  After Husband appealed an equitable distribution award, Wife retained me to (successfully) defend the appeal.

The primary issue on appeal was the valuation of Husband’s business property.  The Court of Appeals affirmed that the family court did not error in failing to qualify Husband’s appraiser (who primarily appraised residential real estate) as an expert.  It further affirmed that the family court could properly give greater weight to the opinion of Wife’s appraiser in valuing the commercial real estate.  Finally, the Court of Appeals affirmed that the family court had not made math errors in its equitable distribution award.

Put Mr. Forman’s experience, knowledge, and dedication to your service for any of your South Carolina family law needs.

Recent Blog Posts

Court of Appeals reverses grant of visitation to grandparents

The February 12, 2025, Court of Appeals opinion in Dendy v. Gamble reversed a family court’s award of visitation to Grandparents. This opinion

[ + ] Read More

Pleadings and motions say why you want at a motion hearing but you need affidavits to say why you’re entitled to it

I encounter litigants, and sometimes even attorneys, who rest on their pleadings and motions (including returns to motions) to support their requests for

[ + ] Read More

South Carolina Supreme Court’s proposed new rule addressing temporary hearings is a substantial improvement with a glaring flaw

On January 29, 2025, the South Carolina Supreme Court proposed an amendment to Rule 21, SCFCR, to the South Carolina General Assembly.  If

[ + ] Read More