Perry v. Olson is an unpublished May, 2023 opinion from the Court of Appeals.  On appeal, I represented the mother, Ms. Olson, who, at trial, had lost custody of her son. At the beginning of the appeal process, I had that custody order superseded, so she kept custody during the three years the appeal took to resolve. 

The Court of Appeals originally scheduled oral argument. When it later cancelled oral argument, I expected a reversal or a remand for a new trial. Instead it affirmed, disposing with my substantial argument on custody with a mere “The family court did not err in granting Father custody of Child without prohibiting contact between Child and Father’s brother.” When the Supreme Court refused to grant certiorari, the child was returned to father.

Olson remains one of the biggest disappointments of my career.

Put Mr. Forman’s experience, knowledge, and dedication to your service for any of your South Carolina family law needs.

Recent Blog Posts

Court of Appeals reverses grant of visitation to grandparents

The February 12, 2025, Court of Appeals opinion in Dendy v. Gamble reversed a family court’s award of visitation to Grandparents. This opinion

[ + ] Read More

Pleadings and motions say why you want at a motion hearing but you need affidavits to say why you’re entitled to it

I encounter litigants, and sometimes even attorneys, who rest on their pleadings and motions (including returns to motions) to support their requests for

[ + ] Read More

South Carolina Supreme Court’s proposed new rule addressing temporary hearings is a substantial improvement with a glaring flaw

On January 29, 2025, the South Carolina Supreme Court proposed an amendment to Rule 21, SCFCR, to the South Carolina General Assembly.  If

[ + ] Read More